LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
DEOriginalENFRITRM
ProfileMy profile
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
Language
DEOriginalENFRITRM
LoginMy profile
AI translationIf versions differ, the German original is authoritative.German original →
Law Blog

File evidence: The submission argued that an equal division of the two autumn-holiday weeks would provide reli

The submission argued that an equal division of the two autumn-holiday weeks would provide reliable and foreseeable care arrangements for the child. It also opposed compensation for the cancelled August week, referring to the court's finding of 3 August 2026 that the father had known by early June that no agreement on the summer holidays had been reached but filed his application only on 31 July.

Sat Sep 19
Source
01
Kurzstellungnahme der anwaltlichen Vertretung · 14.08.2026

09/17/2026, 05:21:55 AM · Europe/Zurich · indexed · Fri Aug 14 · SHA-256 f666a141d8300f42…

Fedlex – Swiss federal law ↗

What the source documents

The submission argued that an equal division of the two autumn-holiday weeks would provide reliable and foreseeable care arrangements for the child. It also opposed compensation for the cancelled August week, referring to the court's finding of 3 August 2026 that the father had known by early June that no agreement on the summer holidays had been reached but filed his application only on 31 July.

Context

This file item is recorded close to the source. LawReport separates documented content, involved roles, actions and any later legal assessment.

Unlock the full article

This article costs CHF 27.75 net + 8.1% VAT = CHF 30.00 gross. One-time Stripe payment. No monthly fee.

Sign in
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
PrivacyImprintCookie policyReport a correction
© 2026 LawReport.ch