What the source documents
The submission argued that an equal division of the two autumn-holiday weeks would provide reliable and foreseeable care arrangements for the child. It also opposed compensation for the cancelled August week, referring to the court's finding of 3 August 2026 that the father had known by early June that no agreement on the summer holidays had been reached but filed his application only on 31 July.
Context
This file item is recorded close to the source. LawReport separates documented content, involved roles, actions and any later legal assessment.