LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
DEOriginalENFRITRM
ProfileMy profile
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
Language
DEOriginalENFRITRM
LoginMy profile
AI translationIf versions differ, the German original is authoritative.German original →
Law Blog

File evidence: The mother subsequently agreed to the holiday period from 5 to 11 October 2026 but rejected an

The mother subsequently agreed to the holiday period from 5 to 11 October 2026 but rejected an additional period from 12 to 18 October. The submission argued that this already respected the father's holiday entitlement and gave the child a clear arrangement in advance, while the two requested blocks would be separated by only 15 hours.

Sat Sep 19
Source
01
Kurzstellungnahme der anwaltlichen Vertretung · 14.08.2026

09/17/2026, 05:21:55 AM · Europe/Zurich · indexed · Fri Aug 14 · SHA-256 f666a141d8300f42…

Fedlex – Swiss federal law ↗

What the source documents

The mother subsequently agreed to the holiday period from 5 to 11 October 2026 but rejected an additional period from 12 to 18 October. The submission argued that this already respected the father's holiday entitlement and gave the child a clear arrangement in advance, while the two requested blocks would be separated by only 15 hours.

Context

This file item is recorded close to the source. LawReport separates documented content, involved roles, actions and any later legal assessment.

Unlock the full article

This article costs CHF 27.75 net + 8.1% VAT = CHF 30.00 gross. One-time Stripe payment. No monthly fee.

Sign in
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
PrivacyImprintCookie policyReport a correction
© 2026 LawReport.ch