File-based classification.The decision described the child’s welfare as the supreme maxim; the interests and wishes of the parents recede when regulating the parent–child relationship.
The documented point
The decision designated the child's welfare as the paramount principle; the interests and wishes of the parents recede in the regulation of the parent–child relationship.
Why this point is independently relevant
This entry isolates precisely this item in the record and does not conflate it with other issues in dispute. This keeps visible what the court or the source actually recorded and which conclusions would only be editorial interpretation.
Limit of testimony
This point concerns a documented judicial finding or reasoning. No further conclusions are drawn from it regarding motives, character, or any alleged cooperation between persons.
Transparent linkage
Only verified public roles, the involved institution, the disclosed source and factually appropriate topics are linked. Private family members remain anonymised; public case numbers are not reproduced.