File-based classification.The decision emphasized that an appropriate regulation of personal contact cannot be determined abstractly, but must be decided in the concrete individual case at the court’s judicial discretion.
The documented point
The decision emphasized that an appropriate regulation of personal contact cannot be set out in abstract terms, but must be determined in the concrete individual case at the court's judicial discretion.
Why this point is independently relevant
This entry isolates precisely this docket item and does not conflate it with other issues in dispute. This preserves what the court or the source actually recorded and which inferences would only be editorial framing.
limit of testimony
This item is a documented judicial finding or reasoning. No further statements about motives, character, or any alleged collaboration of persons are inferred from it.
Transparent linking
Only verified public roles, the institution involved, the disclosed source and factually relevant topics are linked. Private family members remain anonymized; public case numbers are not reproduced.