File-based classification.From the emails, the court inferred existing disagreements and impeded communication; at the same time it held that predominantly written communication, by itself, does not argue against alternating custody.
The documented point
From the emails, the court deduced existing disagreements and difficult communication; at the same time it held that predominantly written communication alone does not speak against alternating custody.
Why this point is independently relevant
This entry isolates precisely this item in the file and does not conflate it with other issues in dispute. As a result, it remains clear what the court or the source actually recorded and which inferences would only be editorial interpretation.
Testimony limit
This point is a documented judicial finding or reasoning. No further statement about motives, character or any alleged cooperation between persons is derived from it.
Transparent linking
Only verified public roles, the involved institution, the released source and factually appropriate topics are linked. Private family members remain anonymized; public case numbers are not reproduced.