File evidence: The father's submission disputed the opposing costs request

What the source documents

The father's submission disputed the opposing costs request. It argued that judicial specification had become necessary because no agreement was reached and that factual statements had to be corrected by reference to the file. It did not seek to reopen the decision of 3 August 2026 but requested its consistent application by judicially fixing the remaining holiday blocks.

Context

This file item is recorded close to the source. LawReport separates documented content, involved roles, actions and any later legal assessment.