LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
DEOriginalENFRITRM
ProfileMy profile
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
Language
DEOriginalENFRITRM
LoginMy profile
AI translationIf versions differ, the German original is authoritative.German original →
Law Blog

Alternating Custody: Definition, Requirements and Advantages

This draft sketches the topic «alternierende Obhut» (Wechselmodell) briefly. For a substantiated presentation with quotations from court decisions, additional case law and specialist literature are needed; here only a BGer index snapshot is available as a source.

Sat Sep 12
Source
01
Bundesgericht – neu aufgenommene Entscheide ↗

09/12/2026, 07:26:52 PM · Europe/Zurich · indexed

02
Schweizerisches Bundesgericht ↗

09/12/2026, 03:34:16 AM · Europe/Zurich · indexed · SHA-256 8f00e2e800ffc2ad…

Brief overview

The present text version is a draft and is based exclusively on the permitted source snapshot S196:C1 (Index of newly included decisions of the Federal Supreme Court). This index contains no substantive case analysis or decisions regarding alternating custody. Therefore, the following is a concise, generic outline of the topic; specific legal issues and court decisions must be supported by supplementary research in case law and specialist literature.

1. Term

Alternating custody (shared parenting arrangement) is understood to mean that the child regularly and systematically alternates between the residences of both parents while joint custody remains in place. The time allocation can range from alternating weeks to shorter periods or more complex schedules.

2. Typical requirements (overview)

3. Possible advantages

4. Practical and legal-dogmatic notes

Whether the alternating residence model is in the child’s best interests in the specific case is determined by the competent authority based on the individual circumstances. Decisive criteria there are usually the parents’ ability to cooperate, the child’s resilience, reliable framework conditions and possible burdens caused by frequent transitions. Case law can provide guidance in borderline cases; these are not cited here because the present source contains no decisions.

5. Further steps for a more detailed presentation

For a publishable, source-faithful presentation, at least the following additional sources are required:

Source note (only existing source for this draft): S196:C1 – Bundesgericht, Liste der neu aufgenommenen Entscheide (Index). This source contains no substantive content on the subject.

Unlock the full article

This article costs CHF 27.75 net + 8.1% VAT = CHF 30.00 gross. One-time Stripe payment. No monthly fee.

Sign in
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
PrivacyImprintCookie policyReport a correction
© 2026 LawReport.ch