Many mutual allegations were not relevant to the decision

Classification based on the case files.Before its substantive assessment, the court found that numerous mutual accusations were not relevant to, or not substantiated, evidenced or proven with respect to the question of alternating custody.

The documented point

Before its substantive assessment, the court found that numerous mutual allegations were either irrelevant to the question of alternating custody or were not substantiated, supported, or proven.

Why this point is independently relevant

This entry isolates precisely this docket item and does not conflate it with other matters in dispute. This preserves what the court or the source actually recorded and which inferences would be editorial interpretation.

limit of testimony

This item is a documented judicial finding or reasoning. No further statement about motives, character, or an alleged collaboration of persons is inferred from it.

Transparent linking

Only verified public roles, the institution involved, the released source and factually relevant topics are linked. Private family members remain anonymized; public case numbers are not reproduced.