25 to 27 December: Why the decision explicitly excludes contacts
Source-based reconstruction. Private family members are not identified. Officials and professionals are referred to only in their documented capacity.
From 25 to 27 December 2026 the operative part expressly orders no visitation contacts with the father. As an additional holiday block the court sets the period from 28 December 2026 to 3 January 2027 with the father. From 25 to 27 December 2026 the operative part expressly orders no visitation contacts with the father.
Source basis
What the files show
The operative part expressly does not order visitation contacts with the father from 25 to 27 December 2026. As a further holiday block, the court allocates the period from 28 December 2026 to 3 January 2027 to the father.
Application and opposing position
For this aspect, no separate additional request is determinative; the analysis compares the documented state of the file with the result.
From 25 to 27 December 2026 the operative part expressly does not order visitation contacts with the father.
Checkpoint
The question is not whether the child welfare criteria mentioned are permissible in the abstract, but how concrete and complete their factual basis is demonstrated in the present case file.
LawReport Classification
Concepts of the child's welfare such as stability, continuity and primary caregiver must be tied to the specific file record. The decision uses these criteria to justify the division of holidays. LawReport documents the use of these criteria without deriving from them a general assessment of a parent.
What does not follow from this
The documented proceedings substantiate the stated motions, statements and steps in the decision-making process. They do not, without further ado, establish personal motives, bias, abuse of law or a general unlawfulness. Such further assessments would require additional legal and factual grounds.
Further articles