LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
DEOriginalENFRITRM
ProfileMy profile
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
Language
DEOriginalENFRITRM
LoginMy profile
AI translationIf versions differ, the German original is authoritative.German original →
Law Blog

File evidence: The court also found that the father had not sufficiently shown that the first-instance judge h

The court also found that the father had not sufficiently shown that the first-instance judge had expressly refused, despite a legal duty, to issue a decision or had failed to do so within a reasonable time. The judge had announced in the letter of 21 July 2026 that a written decision would be served in due course, and the court assumed that service was imminent.

Sat Sep 19
Source
01
Entscheid vom 3. August 2026 · 03.08.2026

09/20/2026, 06:58:28 PM · Europe/Zurich · indexed · Mon Aug 03 · SHA-256 a2c2c4cc9cc11a26…

Fedlex – Swiss federal law ↗

What the source documents

The court also found that the father had not sufficiently shown that the first-instance judge had expressly refused, despite a legal duty, to issue a decision or had failed to do so within a reasonable time. The judge had announced in the letter of 21 July 2026 that a written decision would be served in due course, and the court assumed that service was imminent.

Context

This file item is recorded close to the source. LawReport separates documented content, involved roles, actions and any later legal assessment.

Unlock the full article

This article costs CHF 27.75 net + 8.1% VAT = CHF 30.00 gross. One-time Stripe payment. No monthly fee.

Sign in
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
PrivacyImprintCookie policyReport a correction
© 2026 LawReport.ch