LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
DEOriginalENFRITRM
ProfileMy profile
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
Language
DEOriginalENFRITRM
LoginMy profile
AI translationIf versions differ, the German original is authoritative.German original →
Law Blog

File evidence: The father also referred to a risk that requested financial decisions would be further delayed

The father also referred to a risk that requested financial decisions would be further delayed. The court considered that assertion unclear and held that he had not shown how the absence of another hearing would cause a disadvantage that could not easily be remedied. The immediate enforceability of provisional measures under Art. 315 para. 2 lit. b CPC was not sufficient by itself.

Sat Sep 19
Source
01
Entscheid vom 3. August 2026 · 03.08.2026

09/20/2026, 06:58:28 PM · Europe/Zurich · indexed · Mon Aug 03 · SHA-256 a2c2c4cc9cc11a26…

Fedlex – Swiss federal law ↗

What the source documents

The father also referred to a risk that requested financial decisions would be further delayed. The court considered that assertion unclear and held that he had not shown how the absence of another hearing would cause a disadvantage that could not easily be remedied. The immediate enforceability of provisional measures under Art. 315 para. 2 lit. b CPC was not sufficient by itself.

Context

This file item is recorded close to the source. LawReport separates documented content, involved roles, actions and any later legal assessment.

Unlock the full article

This article costs CHF 27.75 net + 8.1% VAT = CHF 30.00 gross. One-time Stripe payment. No monthly fee.

Sign in
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
PrivacyImprintCookie policyReport a correction
© 2026 LawReport.ch