Claudia Wetter's involvement can be substantiated, but not a personal motive. It is precisely this distinction that is decisive for a substantiated public presentation.
What the source states
The name Claudia Wetter appears in the source in connection with the cantonal adjudicative body. That is a verifiable fact and justifies linking it to the decision, the court and the topics.
Distinction
The source does not allow conclusions about personal intentions, internal opinion-forming processes, or the claim that Wetter coordinated with another person outside the documented court work. Such assertions would require additional evidence.
Transparency in the graph
For this reason, the editorial classification remains strictly tied to the evidentiary status: documented involvement is made visible; party complaints are labelled as party complaints; motives and undocumented collaboration are not invented.