LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
DEOriginalENFRITRM
ProfileMy profile
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
Language
DEOriginalENFRITRM
LoginMy profile
AI translationIf versions differ, the German original is authoritative.German original →
Law Blog

The response of 9 June: maintaining three blocks and no waiver

By letter of 9 June, a response was made to the letter of 4 June, the holiday registration was upheld and an explicit waiver was not declared. For 2026 three specific holiday blocks were designated; later it was explicitly stated that none of the three weeks of holiday would be waived. By letter of 9 June, a response was made to the letter of 4 June, the holiday registration was upheld and explici…

Sun Sep 13
Source
01
Aktenchronologie Ferienregelung 2026 · Mai–August 2026

09/13/2026, 02:44:57 PM · Europe/Zurich · indexed · Mon Aug 03 · SHA-256 cf5265294762249e…

Fedlex – Swiss federal law ↗

The response of 9 June: Adherence to three blocs and no renunciation

Source-based reconstruction. Private family members are not identified. Officeholders and professionals are mentioned only by their documented function.

By letter of 9 June, the letter of 4 June was replied to, the holiday registration was upheld and no waiver was expressly declared. For 2026 three specific holiday blocks were designated; later it was expressly stated that none of the three holiday weeks would be waived. By letter of 9 June, the letter of 4 June was replied to, the holiday registration was upheld and ausdrücklic…

Sources

What the files show

In a letter dated 9 June a response was made to the letter of 4 June, the holiday registration was maintained and no waiver was expressly declared. For 2026 three specific holiday blocks were designated; later it was expressly stated that none of the three holiday weeks would be waived.

Application and opposing position

For this aspect, no separate additional motion is decisive; the analysis compares the documented state of the file with the outcome.

By letter dated 9. Juni the letter dated 4. Juni was answered, the holiday registration was adhered to, and no waiver was expressly declared.

“A waiver of registered leave is not declared.”

Checkpoint

For review, a strict distinction must be made between party submissions, counsel's application and the court's finding.

LawReport-Classification

The documents show several procedural stages: filing, protective brief, super-provisional petition, statements and the subsequent precautionary decision. For the assessment, each stage must be considered separately; a party's submission is not a judicial finding and a later decision does not retroactively replace the record as it stood at that time.

What does not follow from this

The documented proceedings corroborate the stated motions, statements and decision-making steps. They do not, by themselves, establish personal motives, bias, abuse of rights or a general unlawfulness. Such further assessments would require additional legal and factual grounds.

Further posts

Unlock the full article

This article costs CHF 27.75 net + 8.1% VAT = CHF 30.00 gross. One-time Stripe payment. No monthly fee.

Sign in
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
PrivacyImprintCookie policyReport a correction
© 2026 LawReport.ch