LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
DEOriginalENFRITRM
ProfileMy profile
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
Language
DEOriginalENFRITRM
LoginMy profile
AI translationIf versions differ, the German original is authoritative.German original →
Law Blog

File evidence: The decision states that names of authors and submitters are used solely for clear file attribu

The decision states that names of authors and submitters are used solely for clear file attribution. Because the complaint was considered manifestly inadmissible or unfounded, the court dispensed with obtaining the lower-court file and a response under Art. 322 para. 1 CPC. Jurisdiction lay with the single judge in family law of the Cantonal Court, and the court then examined the admissibility requirements.

Sat Sep 19
Source
01
Entscheid vom 3. August 2026 · 03.08.2026

09/20/2026, 06:58:28 PM · Europe/Zurich · indexed · Mon Aug 03 · SHA-256 a2c2c4cc9cc11a26…

Fedlex – Swiss federal law ↗

What the source documents

The decision states that names of authors and submitters are used solely for clear file attribution. Because the complaint was considered manifestly inadmissible or unfounded, the court dispensed with obtaining the lower-court file and a response under Art. 322 para. 1 CPC. Jurisdiction lay with the single judge in family law of the Cantonal Court, and the court then examined the admissibility requirements.

Context

This file item is recorded close to the source. LawReport separates documented content, involved roles, actions and any later legal assessment.

Unlock the full article

This article costs CHF 27.75 net + 8.1% VAT = CHF 30.00 gross. One-time Stripe payment. No monthly fee.

Sign in
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
PrivacyImprintCookie policyReport a correction
© 2026 LawReport.ch