What the source documents
The decision states that names of authors and submitters are used solely for clear file attribution. Because the complaint was considered manifestly inadmissible or unfounded, the court dispensed with obtaining the lower-court file and a response under Art. 322 para. 1 CPC. Jurisdiction lay with the single judge in family law of the Cantonal Court, and the court then examined the admissibility requirements.
Context
This file item is recorded close to the source. LawReport separates documented content, involved roles, actions and any later legal assessment.