LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
DEOriginalENFRITRM
ProfileMy profile
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
Language
DEOriginalENFRITRM
LoginMy profile
AI translationIf versions differ, the German original is authoritative.German original →
Law Blog

File evidence: The submission referred to Art

The submission referred to Art. 273 para. 1 CC and case law on the mutual right of child and parent to appropriate personal contact, with the child's welfare as the guiding principle. It also cited the court's duty under Art. 296 CPC to clarify the facts ex officio and argued that, if one requested block is not ordered, another complete block may be fixed.

Sat Sep 19
Source
01
Stellungnahme des Gesuchstellers · 26.08.2026

09/17/2026, 05:23:45 AM · Europe/Zurich · indexed · Wed Aug 26 · SHA-256 e8c9e0ea1a1dc8f7…

Fedlex – Swiss federal law ↗

What the source documents

The submission referred to Art. 273 para. 1 CC and case law on the mutual right of child and parent to appropriate personal contact, with the child's welfare as the guiding principle. It also cited the court's duty under Art. 296 CPC to clarify the facts ex officio and argued that, if one requested block is not ordered, another complete block may be fixed.

Context

This file item is recorded close to the source. LawReport separates documented content, involved roles, actions and any later legal assessment.

Unlock the full article

This article costs CHF 27.75 net + 8.1% VAT = CHF 30.00 gross. One-time Stripe payment. No monthly fee.

Sign in
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
PrivacyImprintCookie policyReport a correction
© 2026 LawReport.ch