File evidence: The first-instance judge had expressly stated on 30 March 2026 that possible child-protection m

What the source documents

The first-instance judge had expressly stated on 30 March 2026 that possible child-protection measures still had to be examined. Even applying a less strict standard because the father was not legally trained or represented, the Cantonal Court held that he had not sufficiently shown a disadvantage that could not easily be remedied.

Context

This file item is recorded close to the source. LawReport separates documented content, involved roles, actions and any later legal assessment.