File evidence: The challenged letter merely stated that no further oral hearing would take place and that the

What the source documents

The challenged letter merely stated that no further oral hearing would take place and that the decision on interim measures would follow. The court considered whether this could constitute a procedural order within the meaning of Art. 319 lit. b CPC, noting that procedural orders are judicial directions made during proceedings without fully or partly disposing of the case.

Context

This file item is recorded close to the source. LawReport separates documented content, involved roles, actions and any later legal assessment.