LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
DEOriginalENFRITRM
ProfileMy profile
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
Language
DEOriginalENFRITRM
LoginMy profile
AI translationIf versions differ, the German original is authoritative.German original →
Law Blog

The 15 June decision: Why the court clerk must be properly classified

A specific professional role is ascribed to Jeannine Schweizer in the 15.-Juni-Entscheid. The proper classification consists precisely in not making that role either smaller or larger than the source warrants.

Sun Sep 13
Source
01
Aktenchronologie Ferienregelung 2026 · Mai–August 2026

09/13/2026, 02:46:58 PM · Europe/Zurich · indexed · Mon Aug 03 · SHA-256 cf5265294762249e…

Fedlex – Swiss federal law ↗

For Jeannine Schweizer a concrete professional role is assigned in the 15.-Juni-Entscheid. The proper classification consists precisely in not making this role either smaller or larger than the source provides.

What the source states

The decision names the court clerk. That is sufficient for a public professional linkage, provided the person’s profile and role are verified.

Delineation

Naming alone is insufficient to support the allegation that Schweizer cast a judicial vote, determined the outcome, or independently decided on the subsistence minimum under debt enforcement law. The source provides no corresponding evidence for that.

Transparency in the graph

Transparency is achieved here through precise limitation: professional participation yes, judicial decision-making authority no. It is precisely this distinction that is recorded in the relationships between persons and institutions.

Unlock the full article

This article costs CHF 27.75 net + 8.1% VAT = CHF 30.00 gross. One-time Stripe payment. No monthly fee.

Sign in
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
PrivacyImprintCookie policyReport a correction
© 2026 LawReport.ch