LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
DEOriginalENFRITRM
ProfileMy profile
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
TopicsPeopleInstitutionsLaw BlogLaw Community
Language
DEOriginalENFRITRM
LoginMy profile
AI translationIf versions differ, the German original is authoritative.German original →
Law Blog

Ivo Kuster in the Zirkulationsentscheid: What his involvement actually means

Ivo Kusters Mitwirkung ist im Zirkulationsentscheid dokumentiert; der Aktenbefund zeigt eine Beteiligung im Spruchkörper, nicht eine alleinige Urheberschaft des Entscheids.

Sun Sep 13
Source
01
Aktenchronologie Ferienregelung 2026 · Mai–August 2026

09/13/2026, 02:46:58 PM · Europe/Zurich · indexed · Mon Aug 03 · SHA-256 cf5265294762249e…

Fedlex – Swiss federal law ↗

Ivo Kusters' participation is documented in the circulation decision; the file record shows participation in the deciding panel, not sole authorship of the decision.

What the source states

The cantonal circulation decision of 15 June 2026 lists Caroline Gstöhl as president, Ivo Kuster and Claudia Wetter as cantonal judges, and Jeannine Schweizer as court clerk. This thereby documents Kuster’s participation as a judge.

Delineation

This attribution of authorship makes a clear statement: Kuster belonged to the decisive adjudicating body. It does not, however, carry the further claim that he personally formulated every single consideration or shaped the decision on his own.

Transparency in the graph

For LawReport, therefore, the relation Person → judicial role → Cantonal Court → circulation decision → source is stored. That exact chain makes their involvement visible, without construing collegial participation as individual sole responsibility.

Unlock the full article

This article costs CHF 27.75 net + 8.1% VAT = CHF 30.00 gross. One-time Stripe payment. No monthly fee.

Sign in
LawReport.chLawReport.ch
PrivacyImprintCookie policyReport a correction
© 2026 LawReport.ch