The record primarily establishes a representation and service role. It does not justify wider attribution without a specific submission.
The decision of 3 August
In decision [interne Kennung entfernt] of 3 August 2026, Raphael Fisch is identified as counsel for the respondent. The court rejected the request for an immediate super-provisional handover of the child for the holiday week from 3 to 9 August.
For the remaining requests, the court granted the respondent ten days to submit a written response. Service on Fisch included the application of 30 July 2026, a letter from the applicant dated 3 August and the protective letter of 5 June 2026. No oral hearing was planned.
Correct attribution
The decision therefore establishes that Fisch was addressed as counsel and served with the documents at this stage. Any specific position he later took must be established from the later submission itself and cannot be inferred merely from service.